A data-based review of China small-pack tomato paste exports, covering volume growth, average export unit value, the 2025 price reset and the value-added role of retail-size packaging.
China small-pack tomato paste exports expanded from 253,963 tons in 2021 to 486,487 tons in 2025, a gain of about 91.6%. The highest full-year volume appeared in 2024 at 518,480 tons, while average export unit value peaked earlier at US$1,006/ton in 2023 and then reset to US$744/ton in 2025. Small-pack products did not show a permanent per-ton premium over large-pack exports. The more useful signal is price resilience since 2025, together with a product-mix signal that may understate the value added by packaging, processing, labeling and channel access.
This article reviews China Customs export data for tomato paste in containers weighing 5kg or less from January 2021 to April 2026. It is a companion analysis to our broader China tomato paste export data review, which focuses mainly on large-pack and industrial-use tomato paste.
Small-pack tomato paste is closer to retail shelves, distributor channels, foodservice kitchens and private-label projects. For Chinese suppliers, it is one possible way to move beyond pure bulk-price competition and explore higher value-added business. For buyers, the data helps separate two questions: whether shipment volume is still active, and whether the average export unit value is moving up, stabilizing or correcting.
The average export unit value in this article is calculated from China Customs export value divided by export volume. It is used for market trend analysis only and does not represent RTM Tomato's actual quotation, nor the transaction price of any specific supplier, product, contract or shipment. Actual tomato paste prices may vary by Brix level, color value, processing type, packaging format, destination market, shipment timing, contract terms and product specification.
The first chart uses full-year data for 2021-2025 and shows January-April 2026 separately. The monthly charts use actual month-by-month values.
This comparison uses full-year data for 2021-2025 and January-April data for 2026. The chart compares customs average export unit value only; it is not a quotation or a transaction-price comparison.
Full-year rows use exact annual calculations. The 2026 row covers January-April only and should not be compared with full-year volume.
| Full-year / YTD period | Export volume | Export value (US$ million) | Avg export unit value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 253,963 tons | 211.7 | US$834/ton | Base year for this review period. |
| 2022 | 285,307 tons | 268.7 | US$942/ton | Moderate volume growth with a higher average unit value. |
| 2023 | 512,730 tons | 516.0 | US$1,006/ton | Large volume expansion and the highest full-year export value. |
| 2024 | 518,480 tons | 492.2 | US$949/ton | Full-year volume peaked, while average unit value started to soften. |
| 2025 | 486,487 tons | 362.0 | US$744/ton | Volume remained high, but average unit value reset sharply. |
| Jan-Apr 2026 | 155,147 tons | 107.3 | US$692/ton | January-April only; not comparable with full-year volume. |
This table compares the same January-April period across years, making the 2026 data easier to read without mixing YTD and full-year figures.
| YTD period | Export volume | Export value (US$ million) | Avg export unit value | Volume YoY | Avg unit value YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Apr 2021 | 78,302 tons | 64.0 | US$818/ton | n/a | n/a |
| Jan-Apr 2022 | 72,855 tons | 66.1 | US$907/ton | -7.0% | +11.0% |
| Jan-Apr 2023 | 138,280 tons | 139.7 | US$1,011/ton | +89.8% | +11.4% |
| Jan-Apr 2024 | 206,617 tons | 204.8 | US$991/ton | +49.4% | -1.9% |
| Jan-Apr 2025 | 175,182 tons | 133.5 | US$762/ton | -15.2% | -23.1% |
| Jan-Apr 2026 | 155,147 tons | 107.3 | US$692/ton | -11.4% | -9.2% |
Monthly values below are rounded for readability. The annual and YTD tables above use exact calculations from the underlying customs data.
| Month | Export volume | Avg export unit value |
|---|---|---|
| 2021-01 | about 24.1k tons | about US$780/ton |
| 2021-02 | about 13.6k tons | about US$820/ton |
| 2021-03 | about 20.3k tons | about US$860/ton |
| 2021-04 | about 20.3k tons | about US$820/ton |
| 2021-05 | about 24.4k tons | about US$820/ton |
| 2021-06 | about 23.8k tons | about US$830/ton |
| 2021-07 | about 19.3k tons | about US$850/ton |
| 2021-08 | about 26.9k tons | about US$810/ton |
| 2021-09 | about 26.6k tons | about US$830/ton |
| 2021-10 | about 18.9k tons | about US$850/ton |
| 2021-11 | about 16.6k tons | about US$870/ton |
| 2021-12 | about 19.2k tons | about US$900/ton |
| 2022-01 | about 20.1k tons | about US$880/ton |
| 2022-02 | about 11.5k tons | about US$940/ton |
| 2022-03 | about 20.6k tons | about US$940/ton |
| 2022-04 | about 20.7k tons | about US$880/ton |
| 2022-05 | about 23.6k tons | about US$930/ton |
| 2022-06 | about 26.3k tons | about US$900/ton |
| 2022-07 | about 27.9k tons | about US$890/ton |
| 2022-08 | about 22.3k tons | about US$930/ton |
| 2022-09 | about 21.0k tons | about US$960/ton |
| 2022-10 | about 25.1k tons | about US$950/ton |
| 2022-11 | about 32.0k tons | about US$960/ton |
| 2022-12 | about 34.2k tons | about US$1,060/ton |
| 2023-01 | about 36.4k tons | about US$1,010/ton |
| 2023-02 | about 30.5k tons | about US$1,070/ton |
| 2023-03 | about 35.5k tons | about US$970/ton |
| 2023-04 | about 35.8k tons | about US$990/ton |
| 2023-05 | about 37.8k tons | about US$980/ton |
| 2023-06 | about 38.7k tons | about US$1,020/ton |
| 2023-07 | about 38.9k tons | about US$1,000/ton |
| 2023-08 | about 35.0k tons | about US$980/ton |
| 2023-09 | about 56.8k tons | about US$1,030/ton |
| 2023-10 | about 57.2k tons | about US$1,020/ton |
| 2023-11 | about 56.3k tons | about US$1,010/ton |
| 2023-12 | about 53.7k tons | about US$980/ton |
| 2024-01 | about 69.3k tons | about US$1,000/ton |
| 2024-02 | about 41.2k tons | about US$1,000/ton |
| 2024-03 | about 45.5k tons | about US$970/ton |
| 2024-04 | about 50.6k tons | about US$990/ton |
| 2024-05 | about 45.7k tons | about US$1,020/ton |
| 2024-06 | about 32.0k tons | about US$990/ton |
| 2024-07 | about 27.1k tons | about US$950/ton |
| 2024-08 | about 31.4k tons | about US$890/ton |
| 2024-09 | about 55.9k tons | about US$960/ton |
| 2024-10 | about 54.1k tons | about US$860/ton |
| 2024-11 | about 31.5k tons | about US$840/ton |
| 2024-12 | about 34.1k tons | about US$830/ton |
| 2025-01 | about 54.3k tons | about US$760/ton |
| 2025-02 | about 30.8k tons | about US$780/ton |
| 2025-03 | about 44.7k tons | about US$770/ton |
| 2025-04 | about 45.3k tons | about US$750/ton |
| 2025-05 | about 41.5k tons | about US$760/ton |
| 2025-06 | about 28.7k tons | about US$740/ton |
| 2025-07 | about 43.3k tons | about US$750/ton |
| 2025-08 | about 24.6k tons | about US$750/ton |
| 2025-09 | about 41.1k tons | about US$710/ton |
| 2025-10 | about 36.5k tons | about US$740/ton |
| 2025-11 | about 48.5k tons | about US$730/ton |
| 2025-12 | about 47.1k tons | about US$720/ton |
| 2026-01 | about 44.6k tons | about US$690/ton |
| 2026-02 | about 41.9k tons | about US$670/ton |
| 2026-03 | about 31.1k tons | about US$700/ton |
| 2026-04 | about 37.5k tons | about US$710/ton |
Small-pack export volume moved from 253,963 tons in 2021 to 285,307 tons in 2022, then jumped sharply to 512,730 tons in 2023. That 2023 increase was the strongest volume change in this review period and showed that retail-size and distributor-ready packaging became a much more visible part of China's tomato paste export mix.
In 2024, full-year small-pack exports reached 518,480 tons, only slightly above 2023, before easing to 486,487 tons in 2025. The important point is that the 2025 volume was still far above the 2021 and 2022 levels. This suggests that the small-pack business did not disappear after the high-price cycle; it moved into a more competitive price environment.
The average export unit value rose from US$834/ton in 2021 to US$942/ton in 2022 and US$1,006/ton in 2023. The 2023 level was the highest full-year value in the dataset, reflecting stronger pricing during the high-price phase of the tomato paste cycle.
After that, the correction became clear. Average export unit value eased to US$949/ton in 2024 and then fell to US$744/ton in 2025. Export value also declined from US$516.0 million in 2023 to US$362.0 million in 2025, even though shipment volume stayed high. In other words, 2025 was not mainly a volume-collapse year; it was a price-reset year for small-pack exports.
Small-pack tomato paste did not consistently record a higher average export unit value than large-pack products. In 2023, small-pack average unit value was US$1,006 per ton, below approximately US$1,185 per ton for large-pack exports. The gap narrowed in 2024 and reversed in 2025, when small-pack unit value reached US$744 per ton compared with US$675 per ton for large-pack products. In January-April 2026, the corresponding figures were US$692 and US$666 per ton.
The more meaningful signal is therefore not a permanent small-pack premium, but greater price resilience during the market correction. From 2023 to 2025, small-pack average unit value declined by about 26%, while large-pack unit value fell by approximately 43%. This suggests that small packaging was less exposed to the sharp correction in bulk tomato paste prices.
The direct comparison may also understate the value added by small packaging. Customs unit value is calculated per ton of finished product and is not adjusted for Brix. Small-pack exports may contain a larger share of lower-Brix, consumer-ready products, while large-pack exports are more closely associated with concentrated industrial paste.
A similar per-ton unit value therefore does not necessarily indicate similar product economics. If a lower-Brix small-pack product achieves a unit value close to that of concentrated bulk paste, part of the value may come from processing, packaging, labeling, carton configuration and access to retail, foodservice or distributor channels.
The customs data does not provide a sufficiently detailed Brix breakdown to calculate this premium directly. The comparison should therefore be treated as an indicative product-mix signal rather than a controlled concentration-adjusted price test. Even so, the combination of comparable unit values and stronger price resilience supports the view that small packaging offers value beyond the underlying bulk paste.
For China tomato paste suppliers, small packaging can be a practical way to explore higher value-added business. Compared with large-pack industrial paste, small-pack products are closer to finished goods. They require more work in packaging, carton design, labeling, shelf-life control, retail or distributor specifications and destination-market compliance.
This does not mean small-pack exports are separated from the broader tomato paste price cycle. The 2025 and early 2026 data shows that average unit value can still correct when the base paste market weakens and buyers become more cautious. But small packaging gives suppliers more room to compete on product format, brand support, packing quality, delivery reliability and channel service, not only on the raw paste price.
Supply-side conditions still matter. Our article on why Xinjiang is central to China tomato paste exports explains the production base behind China's tomato paste supply. The small-pack route adds another layer: how that supply is converted into buyer-ready formats for retail, foodservice and wholesale channels.
January-April 2026 small-pack exports reached 155,147 tons, compared with 175,182 tons in January-April 2025. That was down 11.4% year on year. Average export unit value was US$692/ton, down 9.2% from the same period in 2025.
The 2026 data should therefore be read as a lower-price, cautious-volume start rather than a strong rebound signal. For buyers, it may point to a more negotiable sourcing environment, but quotation decisions still need to be checked against exact pack size, Brix level, color value, carton specification, shipment month and destination requirements.
For importers, distributors and food manufacturers, small-pack export data is useful because it reflects a product category closer to market-ready formats. It can help buyers judge whether China is still shipping meaningful retail-size volume, and whether the average export unit value is moving in line with broader tomato paste pricing.
Destination markets also matter. Buyers can read this article together with our review of China tomato paste export destinations to understand how demand has shifted across buyer countries and regions.
From 2021 to 2025, China small-pack tomato paste exports moved through a clear expansion and correction cycle. Volume rose strongly, peaked in 2024 and remained high in 2025. Average export unit value peaked earlier in 2023, then declined through 2024 and 2025 as the market moved into a price-reset phase.
Small packaging does not generate a permanent per-ton premium over large-pack tomato paste. Its value-added role is better reflected in two signals: stronger price resilience during the recent market correction, and the ability of potentially lower-Brix, consumer-ready products to achieve unit values close to concentrated industrial paste. Although the customs data cannot isolate a precise Brix-adjusted packaging premium, the overall pattern supports small packaging as a way for suppliers to compete through processing, packaging, customization and channel access rather than through bulk paste price alone.
RTM Tomato can support buyers with tomato paste specifications, packaging format discussion, carton and label requirements, shipment planning and long-term supply coordination.
Contact RTM for tomato paste sourcingThis article is based on China Customs export data for tomato paste in containers weighing 5kg or less from January 2021 to April 2026. Export volume refers to the declared quantity in kilograms, converted into metric tons. Export value refers to customs export value in US dollars. Average export unit value is calculated as export value divided by export volume. The 2026 data covers January-April only and should not be treated as a full-year figure. The small-pack versus large-pack comparison uses the same calculation method for both packaging formats.
Tell us your requirements — we’ll respond within 24 hours.