Monthly Data Update

China Tomato Paste Export Data Update: July 2026: Volume, Unit Value & Destinations

July remained an old-crop transition month: buyers were waiting for Crop 2026, shipment volume fell for a second consecutive month, and the average export unit value held near US$700/ton.

China exported 44,693 tons of bulk tomato paste in July 2026, down 10.8% from June and 23.7% year on year. Export value fell to US$31.34 million, while the calculated average export unit value edged up to US$701/ton. The decline extended the late-season pattern seen in June: buyers were waiting for Crop 2026, but new-crop material had not yet entered July export shipments. July exports reached 62 destination markets. The Philippines remained the largest by export value, followed by Russia and Saudi Arabia, while the United Arab Emirates and South Korea recorded the largest positive monthly value changes among established July markets. Crop 2026 production is now underway and factories have started operating, shifting the market from waiting for new-crop supply to confirming specifications, allocation and shipment schedules.

This update extends our longer-term China tomato paste export data review and our analysis of China tomato paste export destinations.

Part 1 — July Volume and Average Export Unit Value

July was the second consecutive month of lower shipment volume. Exports fell by 5,416 tons from June to 44,693 tons, the lowest monthly total in January-July 2026. Export value declined by 10.3% month on month, broadly in line with the 10.8% volume decline.

The average export unit value moved only slightly, rising 0.6% from US$697/ton in June to US$701/ton in July. It was 4.7% above July 2025.

January-July 2026 Export Volume and Average Export Unit Value

Monthly export volume is shown in metric tons. Average export unit value is calculated from export value divided by export volume.

January-July 2026 volume and unit value Monthly export volume and calculated average export unit value. 0k 10k 20k 30k 40k 50k 60k 70k $620 $640 $660 $680 $700 $720 54.2k Jan 50.9k Feb 56.2k Mar 58.8k Apr 59.8k May 50.1k Jun 44.7k Jul $682 $656 $680 $647 $641 $697 $701 Bars: export volume (tons) Line: average export unit value (US$/ton)

July and January-July Year-on-Year Comparison

Period averages are weighted calculations based on total export value divided by total export volume.

Period2025 volume2026 volumeVolume YoY2025 avg unit value2026 avg unit valueUnit value YoY
July58,562 tons44,693 tons-23.7%US$669/tonUS$701/ton+4.7%
January-July410,837 tons374,715 tons-8.8%US$663/tonUS$670/ton+1.1%

July export value was 20.1% lower year on year. For January-July, export value was 7.8% lower, compared with an 8.8% decline in physical volume.

January-July 2026 Monthly Data

MonthExport volumeExport valueAvg export unit valueVolume MoMUnit value MoM
January 202654,178 tonsUS$36.95 millionUS$682/tonn/an/a
February 202650,919 tonsUS$33.42 millionUS$656/ton-6.0%-3.8%
March 202656,188 tonsUS$38.21 millionUS$680/ton+10.3%+3.6%
April 202658,811 tonsUS$38.05 millionUS$647/ton+4.7%-4.9%
May 202659,817 tonsUS$38.32 millionUS$641/ton+1.7%-1.0%
June 202650,109 tonsUS$34.91 millionUS$697/ton-16.2%+8.8%
July 202644,693 tonsUS$31.34 millionUS$701/ton-10.8%+0.6%

How to Read the July Volume-Price Signal

January-July exports totaled 374,715 tons, with an export value of US$251.20 million and a weighted average export unit value of US$670/ton. Cumulative volume was 8.8% below the same period of 2025, while the period-average unit value was only 1.1% higher.

The June-July decline should be read in the context of the crop transition. RTM's supplier-side observation is that buyers were increasingly waiting for Crop 2026, while new-crop commercial cargo had not yet entered July export shipments. At the same time, available Crop 2025 inventory was moving toward its final stage. With buyers delaying part of their purchasing and no new-crop volume yet available to replace the old crop, exports fell from 59,817 tons in May to 50,109 tons in June and 44,693 tons in July—a two-month decline of 25.3%.

The calculated average export unit value moved in the opposite direction, from US$641/ton in May to US$697/ton in June and US$701/ton in July. RTM reads this divergence as a late-old-crop pattern: earlier inventory clearance had reduced the remaining supply, fewer tons were moving, and the customs average was no longer being pulled down by the same level of old-crop clearance activity. It does not mean that every specification or destination followed the same price path.

Part 2 — July Destination Markets

July exports were recorded across 62 destination markets, down from 65 in June. The Philippines remained first by export value with a 14.7% share, followed by Russia at 10.7% and Saudi Arabia at 9.5%.

The top-five share rose by 1.1 percentage points to 46.2%, and the top-ten share increased by 2.5 points to 65.0%. July therefore combined fewer recorded markets with a moderately more concentrated head of the ranking.

Top July 2026 Export Destinations

July 2026 top destination countries Share of July export value by customs-recorded destination. 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% Philippines 14.7% | US$4.60 million Russia 10.7% | US$3.36 million Saudi Arabia 9.5% | US$2.97 million Japan 5.7% | US$1.79 million United Arab Emirates 5.6% | US$1.76 million Ghana 4.3% | US$1.34 million Indonesia 4.2% | US$1.31 million South Korea 3.9% | US$1.21 million Italy 3.7% | US$1.17 million Cameroon 2.8% | US$0.89 million

July Share Change Compared with June

A monthly share increase means a destination gained weight inside July's lower total; it does not necessarily mean end-market demand increased.

July share change compared with June Percentage-point change in export-value share; minimum value threshold applied. -4 pp -3 pp -2 pp -1 pp 0 pp +1 pp +2 pp +3 pp +4 pp Sudan -2.6 pp Poland -2.2 pp Russia -2.2 pp Thailand -1.8 pp United Kingdom -1.5 pp Bulgaria -1.3 pp Japan +1.2 pp Cameroon +1.6 pp Cote d'Ivoire +1.9 pp Indonesia +1.9 pp South Korea +2.6 pp United Arab Emirates +3.0 pp

Gains Offset Part of a Broad Monthly Decline

The United Arab Emirates, South Korea, Cote d'Ivoire, Indonesia and Cameroon generated a combined US$3.18 million increase from June. These gains partly offset the five largest declines—Russia, Sudan, Poland, Thailand and the Philippines—which together reduced export value by US$4.28 million.

Russia remained the second-largest July destination despite a US$1.15 million monthly decline. The Philippines also remained first even though its export value fell by US$0.67 million. Rank persistence alongside lower absolute value is important: a leading share can be maintained in a contracting month.

July 2026 Top Destination Table

Top 15 destination countries by July export value. June share is included to show the monthly rotation.

RankDestination countryJuly volumeJuly valueJuly shareJune shareShare change
1Philippines6,447 tonsUS$4.60 million14.7%15.1%-0.4 pp
2Russia4,984 tonsUS$3.36 million10.7%12.9%-2.2 pp
3Saudi Arabia3,833 tonsUS$2.97 million9.5%8.3%+1.2 pp
4Japan2,095 tonsUS$1.79 million5.7%4.5%+1.2 pp
5United Arab Emirates2,229 tonsUS$1.76 million5.6%2.6%+3.0 pp
6Ghana2,361 tonsUS$1.34 million4.3%4.0%+0.3 pp
7Indonesia1,614 tonsUS$1.31 million4.2%2.2%+1.9 pp
8South Korea1,577 tonsUS$1.21 million3.9%1.2%+2.6 pp
9Italy1,747 tonsUS$1.17 million3.7%4.0%-0.2 pp
10Cameroon1,466 tonsUS$0.89 million2.8%1.3%+1.6 pp
11Thailand1,096 tonsUS$0.78 million2.5%4.3%-1.8 pp
12Vietnam953 tonsUS$0.73 million2.3%2.1%+0.2 pp
13Nigeria931 tonsUS$0.63 million2.0%3.3%-1.3 pp
14Senegal977 tonsUS$0.60 million1.9%1.2%+0.7 pp
15Cote d'Ivoire866 tonsUS$0.58 million1.9%0.0%+1.9 pp

Regional Destination Mix

Regional destination mix rotated in July Export-value share by broad destination region. June 2026 32% 16% 15% 17% 14% July 2026 36% 19% 18% 13% 9% Asia ex. Middle East Africa Middle East/Gulf Eurasia/CIS Europe Americas/Oceania

July Shifted Toward Asia, the Middle East and Africa

Asia excluding the Middle East increased its share by 4.1 percentage points to 36.4%, supported by Japan, South Korea and Indonesia. The Middle East and Gulf gained 2.9 points, led by the United Arab Emirates, while Africa gained 3.3 points as Cote d'Ivoire and Egypt appeared in July and Cameroon increased.

Europe's share declined by 5.0 points and Eurasia/CIS by 3.7 points, reflecting lower shipments to Poland and Russia. These are changes in relative weight inside a smaller monthly total. They should not be read automatically as regional consumption growth or contraction, and country data records declared shipment destinations rather than guaranteed final consumption.

Part 3 — Crop 2026 Has Started: Plan New-Crop Sourcing Now

Crop 2026 production is now underway, and tomato-processing factories have started operating. The market has therefore moved from waiting for the new season to confirming actual production, specifications, allocation and shipment schedules.

This timing also explains why the July export data should not be used as a Crop 2026 price reference. July shipments still reflected the end of the previous crop cycle; new-crop production had not yet translated into July export volume. August and September data will begin to show how quickly Crop 2026 material enters export markets, but buyers do not need to wait for customs data before discussing current requirements directly with a supplier.

For buyers, this is the time to confirm crop year, Brix level, color value, processing type, packaging format, required quantity, loading schedule, destination port and contract terms. Production start does not mean every specification and loading window is immediately interchangeable, so early communication helps match the requirement with actual factory output and available shipment planning. For the broader supply-side background, see why Xinjiang is central to China tomato paste exports.

RTM is now discussing Crop 2026 supply with buyers. Importers, distributors and food manufacturers are welcome to share their target specification, quantity, destination and shipment window. We can respond based on current production, packaging options and the buyer's actual delivery requirement.

Contact RTM for Crop 2026 bulk tomato paste sourcing

Buyer Takeaway

  1. Separate volume from price. July shipment volume fell sharply, while the average export unit value moved only slightly. Do not turn that combination into a broad price conclusion without checking specifications and destinations.
  2. Track the destination rotation. Asia, the Middle East and Africa gained share, but July's total was smaller. Use later Q3 data to test whether the rotation persists.
  3. Confirm new-crop details directly. Crop 2026 processing has started. Compare offers by crop year, quality specification, packaging, available quantity and loading window rather than by customs averages alone.

Price Interpretation Note

The average export unit values in this article are calculated from China Customs export value divided by export volume. They are used for market trend analysis only and do not represent RTM Tomato's actual quotation, nor the transaction price of any specific supplier, product, contract or shipment. Actual tomato paste prices may vary by Brix level, color value, processing type, packaging format, destination market, shipment timing, contract terms and product specification.

Data source: China Customs bulk tomato paste export data from January to July 2026, with July and January-July 2025 aggregate comparison values from the historical dataset used in this export data series. Export volume refers to the first quantity in kilograms, converted into metric tons. Export value refers to customs export value in US dollars. Average export unit values are weighted calculations based on export value divided by export volume. Destination rankings, concentration ratios and regional shares are based on export value. A customs-recorded destination does not necessarily represent final consumption. Percentages may differ slightly because of rounding.

Get a Quote

Tell us your requirements — we’ll respond within 24 hours.